Hello Odds Player
As the Originator of the odds analyzer software, I worked as an analytical chemist. Thus I was use to working with numbers and many types of analytical problems including some probabilities. I believe you can find the overall greatest number of winners and ITM horses from the Tote Board. This is true because all people, even those consistently making money, must put their money in the pool sometime during the betting cycle, wheather it is early, middle, late or very late. (betting cycle = time when the odds can change before the gate opens for a single race.) Many people do not pay any attention to the tote board, because they believe all the the money is from the uninformed general public. But as you use the Odds Analyzer, you will see several changes occur on the horses. To most people this may be just confusing, but the Odds Analyzer clarifies this by labeling every horse in a race. We then kept a database of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, & 4th to see if there was any "ryme or reason" to what happened for specific types of races. We found some conditions and types of races had very consistent winners. For instance, as an opposite we found, some very cheap races were very inconsistent and are best skipped for betting purposes.
Some claim the Odds Analyzer is Bad..
Some claim the Odds Analyzer is Bad because the D1 doesn't win every race. Many people automatically assumed the D1 would be the best play under all circumstances, but this is not true and may be a consistent underlay. There is nothing mythological about the software, it is not all good or bad. It just gives you more insight on each horse in the race. When I developed the odds analyzer, it just measured the intensity of the change, the CT#, now, 2009 I have added the code names, which it figures automatically. So if you like to have a better perspective of the Tote Board with the #, color code, & code name buy the Odds Analyzer. And if you would like a single horse to play under certain circumstances that has an ITM % of 63% and wins 38% of the time with an average mutual of $8.82 also sign up for the Premium Membership.
Odds Analyzer Versus Standard Handicapping
I have won Pick 6s at Arlington Park, Hawthorne, and Santa Anita, as well as Twin Trifectas, Superfectas & Trifectas, over 30 years using standard handicapping, but at the end of year, mostly behind on money. I have found that by standard handicapping you need more luck than anything else. TVG & HRTV handicappers explain on a daily basis why most of the lower odds horses could win. (Like 3rd time back after a layoff, best trainer, best early speed horse, top jockey, or highest class in the race.) If they pick one horse, they are depending heavily on Luck! They are just taking an educated guess as to whom the winner will be. It only takes one 12/1 horse to knock them out of the Pick 4. After 30 years, the best I have found for analyzing a race is the Odds Analyzer and knowing which races to play and which races to skip.
©2007 CT-Software, horse enterprises since Jan. 1, 1963
-Premium Buy-Site Map-Index of Databases-Members Login-FAQs-Testimonials-New=9/7/09
